Extract images

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description reveals it is proxied and lacks GraphQL backing, but does not explain behavioral traits like network calls, error handling, or permissions. Minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences covering purpose and a key implementation detail. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple extraction tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides enough context. Could mention output format or failure behavior, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's description. Baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Extract and fetch images' and resource 'from markdown content'. Unambiguous and distinct from sibling tools like create_attachment or get_attachment.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: when markdown contains images. No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use, and no alternatives mentioned. Siblings don't compete for same task, but guidance is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.