Skip to main content
Glama
wiklob

linear-mcp-lean

by wiklob
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to linear-mcp-lean

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Context Guardian

      Ar5en1c
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that cuts cloud LLM costs 36-42% by indexing context locally and giving agents precision retrieval tools instead of raw context dumps.
      9 npm
      7
      MIT

    • smart-context-mcp

      Arrayo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
      4
      MIT

    • TokenSaver

      Byggarepop
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces token usage for AI coding agents by providing structural code outlines and minification for .NET projects.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation on a specific entity (issue, project, document, etc.). Even similar pairs like create_attachment vs create_attachment_from_upload are clearly differentiated by their parameters and process. The raw GraphQL tool is explicitly a fallback, avoiding ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_issue_label, list_issues, save_issue). The only deviation is linear_graphql, but that is a special-purpose tool, and the pattern holds for all others. Naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 36 tools, the server is comprehensive but slightly heavy. It covers many Linear entities, but the count is above the typical well-scoped range (3–15). Some tools like extract_images and search_documentation are auxiliary, and the diff-related tools add redundancy. Still, the count is reasonable given the domain's complexity.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface lacks delete operations for issues, projects, documents, attachments, comments, milestones, and labels. There are no update operations for labels or comments (save_comment only creates, not updates). These gaps force agents to rely on the raw graphql tool for basic lifecycle management, which is a significant shortcoming.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources