Skip to main content
Glama
whyashthakker

beam-mcp

by whyashthakker
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to beam-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-fortress

      mcp-fortress
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for security vulnerabilities, prompt injection, and tool poisoning, providing risk scores and protection.
      4
      MIT

    • MCP Shield

      rob925
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • meok-mcp-injection-scan-mcp

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for prompt-injection, tool-poisoning, and SSRF vulnerabilities using 30+ canonical rules across 5 severity tiers, with optional signed safety reports for procurement.
      5
      MIT

    • tooltrust-mcp

      AgentSafe-AI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for prompt injection, supply chain attacks, excessive permissions, and code execution risks. Includes an offline blacklist that catches known-compromised packages like LiteLLM 1.82.7/1.82.8 and Trivy with zero latency.
      19
      MIT
    • oathe-mcp by oathe-ai

      oathe-mcpofficial

      oathe-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for https://oathe.ai security audits. Runtime behavioral analysis and security scanner for Ai systems. Check trust scores before installing MCP servers, plugins, or AI agent skills.
      5
      16
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: scanning inline content, scanning a file, listing rules, listing supported agents, and checking collector status. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent beam_ prefix and most follow a verb_noun pattern (scan_content, scan_path, list_rules, list_supported_agents). beam_collector_status is a minor deviation since it uses a noun phrase rather than an explicit verb, but it remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a focused read-only security scanning utility. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the core read-only workflow: scanning content or paths, understanding available detection rules, knowing which agents are supported, and checking collector health. Since the server is explicitly read-only, there are no obvious missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources