clear_body_highlights

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it clears amber highlights and excludes athlete-painted regions, but lacks details on destructiveness, side effects, permissions, or state changes. With no annotations, more could be said.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with core purpose. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no params and output schema present, description covers what it does and what it doesn't touch. Could mention return type beyond 'Confirmation' but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters defined; schema coverage is 100% (empty). Baseline 4 for zero parameters; description adds no param info, which is acceptable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (clear all amber highlights), the target (Body panel), and the scope (only agent-driven, not athlete-painted). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like highlight_body_regions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when needing to clear agent highlights without affecting athlete's work, but does not explicitly state when to use vs. alternatives or provide prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.