Skip to main content
Glama
weicizhou

悦流 Website Audit MCP

by weicizhou

Related Servers

Alternatives to 悦流 Website Audit MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for on-page SEO auditing and JSON-LD schema validation, providing tools for full SEO audit, schema validation, heading hierarchy, and image audit without requiring API keys.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a suite of SEO analysis tools for auditing meta tags, headings, links, keyword density, page speed, and sitemaps without requiring external API keys.
      6
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SEO auditing that performs technical SEO, content quality, Schema.org, sitemap, hreflang, and GEO checks, returning scores and prioritized fixes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Website health checker MCP server - SEO audit, accessibility scan, broken link detection, performance analysis, and page comparison.
      26 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that audits websites for technical and on-page SEO, enabling users to ask why a page isn't ranking and receive specific, actionable answers.
      13
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for SEO, performance, GEO, and UX audits with 37 tools covering technical SEO, Lighthouse performance, AI search optimization, content analysis, accessibility, security, and more.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one checks specific search-related files (robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt) while the other performs a broader crawl and audit of pages. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their intended use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern (check_search_files, audit_website), using underscore separators consistently. The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server is at the thin end of the spectrum for a website audit toolset. While the two tools cover distinct aspects, the count feels minimal and could benefit from additional tools for a more complete audit experience.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers basic search file checks and on-page crawling, but there are notable missing features such as performance analysis, security headers checks, or detailed schema validation. Agents may find gaps when attempting a thorough website audit.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues