wecandeo_video_exclude_from_package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No behavioral details are provided beyond the minimal action. The description does not disclose whether exclusion is permanent, reversible, or affects the video's status in other contexts. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but offers little transparency about side effects or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the action but could benefit from additional context without becoming verbose. It is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool performs a state-changing operation (exclusion) and has no output schema or annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain the consequences of exclusion, whether it is reversible, or how it interacts with distribution. More context is needed for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented with descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema provides. Per the guidelines, baseline 3 is appropriate when schema covers parameters thoroughly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: to exclude a video from a distribution package. It uses a specific verb 'Exclude' and resource 'video from a distribution package', distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'wecandeo_video_add_to_package' which performs the opposite action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, preconditions, or scenarios for exclusion (e.g., only for videos already in a package, or to undo an addition). No explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool references are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.