wecandeo_archive_folder_by_name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'look up' implying a read operation but lacks explicit behavioral details (e.g., case sensitivity, exact match, return format). No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but overly brief; lacks structural elements like separate sections for usage or behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and lack of details about return behavior or error handling, the description is incomplete. It fails to set expectations for common scenarios like folder not found.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a basic parameter description, but the tool description adds no extra semantics like format or partial matching rules.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool looks up a folder by name, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like wecandeo_archive_list_folders which also retrieves folder information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives, no mention of prerequisites or error scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.