Skip to main content
Glama
webreactiva-devs

MCP Character Counter

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Character Counter

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for analyzing text documents, including counting words and characters. This server helps LLMs perform text analysis tasks by exposing simple document statistics functionality.
      1
      22
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for text file analysis, including metrics like word counts and character frequencies, alongside file reading and directory browsing capabilities. This server enables LLMs to interact with and process local file content securely through the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for AI models to count characters and words in text, supporting English and other space-delimited languages.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server providing utility tools for math, text processing, data conversion, and URL fetching. It supports both STDIO and SSE communication modes for seamless integration with Claude Desktop and remote AI agents.
      5
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a tool to calculate basic text metrics including character count, characters without spaces, and word count.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides basic utility tools for text manipulation, file operations, and calculations, intended to be connected to Claude AI desktop app.
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined, eliminating any ambiguity in selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (count-characters-in-text), and with only one tool, consistency is inherently perfect as there are no other names to compare against.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most practical server purposes, making the server feel thin and limited. While it might suffice for a trivial utility, it lacks the depth expected for broader functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers its stated purpose of counting characters, but the server's scope is minimal. There are no obvious gaps for this narrow domain, but the surface is inherently limited and may not support more complex workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues