Skip to main content
Glama
webanalyticsprobd-maker

Web Analytics & Tracking MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Web Analytics & Tracking MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Google Tag Manager and GA4, enabling tag management, consent auditing, workspace versioning, and analytics reporting through natural language.
      11
      67 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Google Tag Manager that enables interactive setup, diagnostics, remediation, and dataLayer type generation.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Google Tag Manager and Google Ads, enabling AI agents to audit, fix, and manage GTM containers and Google Ads campaigns programmatically.
      126 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server for the Google Tag Manager API v2 with read-only GA4 (Admin + Data API) tooling. 107 tools covering the full GTM surface, including server-side containers. Ships read-only: writes, publishes, and deletes are each gated behind separate opt-in flags, every mutation requires per-call confirmation, and a dry-run mode simulates changes. Includes container audits
      100
      2,166 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager with read and write access, providing 40 tools to manage GA4 reports, audiences, and GTM tags, triggers, and variables via natural language.
      40
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: generating, validating, auditing, and sending events each serve clear purposes. However, 'audit_tracking_readiness' and 'validate_datalayer_event' both involve checking payloads, which could cause some confusion despite their different scopes (readiness/score vs schema validation).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: audit, generate, validate, and send. The naming is predictable and clearly indicates the action being performed.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its purpose of web analytics tracking. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (generation, validation, auditing, server-side sending), so the count feels appropriate without being too thin or heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the primary workflow for implementing and verifying tracking: generate code, validate payloads, audit readiness, and send events. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for fetching schemas or managing tracking configuration, but these are not critical for the core use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues