luneos-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to luneos-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurn any Android phone into an autonomous ARM64 Linux micro-server and AI development appliance with native MCP support.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to manage Android ROM projects through MCP by importing, unpacking, repacking, and synthesizing images, DAT/BR files, and super partitions using the toolkit’s shared workflows.2AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a unified MCP interface for Android APK reverse engineering, metadata analysis, Smali/resource editing, rebuilding, signing, verification, and ADB device testing.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceLets AI coding agents build, test, and lint Android projects with Gradle, control devices and emulators via adb, automate UI through screenshots and input injection, and use a live IDE bridge for refactoring, code inspection, and run configurations. Works with any MCP client over stdio or authenticated HTTP.46MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive access to MCP documentation through structured guides, full-text search, and interactive development workflows for building servers and clients.323 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA growing collection of MCP tools for Android Development. Currently features a deterministic Figma-SVG-to-Android-XML converter, with plans for Gradle analysis, Resource management, and ADB integration tools.714 npm18MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools map cleanly onto distinct retrieval modes: enumerate topics (list), fetch one full document (get), and full-text search across the corpus (search). Descriptions explicitly state when to use each, including cross-references ('Use luneos_list_topics to see valid names'), leaving no realistic chance of misselection.
All three names use the same luneos_ prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern (luneos_list_topics, luneos_get_topic, luneos_search). The singular/plural distinction between get_topic and list_topics is meaningful rather than inconsistent, and the style is uniform throughout.
Three tools is on the thin side but each has a distinct, non-overlapping role and the whole surface is coherent for a read-only knowledge base. Nothing feels padded or missing at the operation level, though a slightly larger set (e.g. browsing by category or recency) would not be unreasonable.
For a read-only knowledge base, list/get/search covers the full retrieval lifecycle with no dead ends: an agent can discover topics, read them in full, or jump straight to a symptom via search. Minor gaps exist around metadata such as topic freshness, categories, or pagination for very large corpora, but core usage is fully supported.