tighten_dialogue

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions the output (cut plan, preview) but does not explain key behavioral aspects like the meaning of confirm, dry_run, or other parameters, nor any destructive or non-destructive nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that front-loads the purpose and outputs. It is appropriately sized but could be more structured with bullet points for parameters or output details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how to use the cut plan, what parameters control tightening behavior, or prerequisites for the input media.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 20%, with only media and noise_db having descriptions. The tool description itself does not add meaning to the other 8 parameters (e.g., head, tail, confirm, dry_run). Since coverage is low, the description should compensate but fails to do so.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it detects and tightens dead air in talking clips, returning a cut plan and optional preview. This verb+resource is specific and distinguishes it from siblings like cut_music or assemble_edit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for talking clips with dead air but does not explicitly state when to use or when not to use this tool over alternatives like cut_music or beat_grid. No when-not or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.