Skip to main content
Glama
wassermanproductions

unofficial-davinci-mcp

generate_fcpxml

Generate an FCPXML 1.9 timeline with video and audio clips, in/out ranges, and markers for clean import into DaVinci Resolve. Use dry_run to preview the plan before writing the file.

Instructions

Generate an FCPXML 1.9 timeline (video + audio clips, in/out ranges, markers) that imports cleanly into DaVinci Resolve via File > Import > Timeline. The primary way to deliver an edit in interchange (free Resolve) mode. dry_run returns the plan; dry_run=false writes the file.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesTimeline/project name.
clipsYesTimeline clips. Each has a path and optional in/out or duration and placement (seconds).
widthNoTimeline width.
heightNoTimeline height.
dry_runNoWhen true (default), return the plan without changing anything.
markersNoTimeline markers.
frame_rateNoTimeline frame rate.
output_pathNoOptional .fcpxml destination.
clip_duration_secondsNoDefault per-clip length when a clip omits in/out and duration.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Covers dry_run and file writing, but lacks details on overwriting, error handling, or permissions, especially since no annotations exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences front-load the core purpose and key behavior, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains the output (file for Resolve import) and dry_run behavior, but omits return format details and error scenarios; good for the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds only overall context (FCPXML version, Resolve compatibility) without enhancing parameter meanings.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates an FCPXML 1.9 timeline with clips and markers for DaVinci Resolve, distinguishing it from siblings like generate_edl.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It positions the tool as 'primary way to deliver an edit in interchange (free Resolve) mode' but does not explicitly exclude alternatives or compare with siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wassermanproductions/unofficial-davinci-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server