Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MaxGaming MCP Server

MaxGaming MCP Server

by washedguy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MaxGaming MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • webhallen-mcp

      LeonardoRO
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search Webhallen’s product catalog, browse categories, compare products, check current and 30-day-lowest prices, inspect physical-store stock, and read customer reviews.
      7
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • aggrometer

      aggrometerofficial

      Aggrometer
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying live cross-platform gaming market data — Steam players, Twitch/YouTube viewership, prices, discounts, hype, and the aggro metric — through 8 read-only tools for summaries, rankings, genre rollups, game details, and search.
      MIT
    • idealo MCP Server

      idealo MCP Serverofficial

      idealo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables product search, price comparison, and price history analysis across 6 European marketplaces (DE, AT, GB, FR, IT, ES).
      25
      MIT

    • NDEX Pricing

      Yyunozor
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search a catalog of video games and consoles and retrieve Swiss observed market prices alongside separately kept external PAL references, with provenance, sample size, freshness and confidence. Read-only, it identifies items first so users get accurate per-source estimates instead of averaged prices of mixed origin.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action: configure storefront, keyword search, browse a known category/brand page, and fetch a single product by URL/article number. The only mild overlap is search_products vs. browse_page, but the descriptions clarify that browsing requires a known category/brand path while search takes a query, so an agent can pick correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_storefronts, search_products, browse_page, get_product). The verbs are precise and non-redundant, making the naming predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lean side but each covers a genuinely different step of the discovery flow (configure, search, browse, inspect). Nothing is redundant, though the surface is small enough that users may want a few more capabilities.

    Completeness3/5

    The read-only browsing lifecycle (storefront selection, search, category browse, product detail) is covered, but there is no way to enumerate categories/brands/campaigns without already having a path, no cross-storefront price or availability comparison, and no cart/order operations. These are workable gaps for a research-only tool but notable ones.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources