Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Online Judge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables automated access to problems, contests, solutions, and public or authenticated user data across global and China platforms, with tools for searching problems, retrieving profiles and submissions, running code, submitting solutions, and managing notes.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to the Repovive competitive-programming platform, enabling them to browse problems and contests, judge and submit code for real verdicts, track ratings, communicate with users, and author verified problems and rounds.
      102
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables code execution and compilation through the Judge0 CE API, supporting multiple programming languages with submission management, status checking, and language configuration retrieval.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT users to retrieve exact programming problems, submit C/C++ solutions only when explicitly requested, and track real judging verdicts through authenticated account linking.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity: get_problem_details retrieves specific problem info, get_submission_status checks submission results, list_my_submissions shows user's submission history, list_problems lists available problems, and submit_code submits new code. The boundaries are well-defined and non-overlapping.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: get_problem_details, get_submission_status, list_my_submissions, list_problems, and submit_code. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for an online judge domain. Each tool earns its place by covering core workflows: browsing problems, getting details, submitting code, and checking results. The count is neither too thin nor excessive for the purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the essential CRUD-like operations for an online judge: list and get for problems, create (submit) for submissions, and get for submission status. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to delete or cancel submissions, but agents can work around this, and core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues