Skip to main content
Glama
wangicheng

Online Judge MCP Server

by wangicheng
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Online Judge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Repovive MCP Server

      dwin-gharibi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to the Repovive competitive-programming platform, enabling them to browse problems and contests, judge and submit code for real verdicts, track ratings, communicate with users, and author verified problems and rounds.
      102
      MIT

    • Judge0 CE MCP Server

      BACH-AI-Tools
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables code execution and compilation through the Judge0 CE API, supporting multiple programming languages with submission management, status checking, and language configuration retrieval.
      9
      MIT

    • codeforces-mcp

      Faysal-star
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to discover unsolved Codeforces practice problems, analyze tag performance, and inspect submissions, profiles, rating history, and upcoming contests through MCP-compatible clients.
      6
      -

    • judge0-mcp

      SundaeYAGO
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Wraps the Judge0 evaluation stack into a local algorithm-problem judging service that exposes seven tools to MCP clients, enabling models to browse problems, self-test against public samples, and submit solutions for full hidden-test grading. Judging parameters, submission limits, and hidden-data access are enforced server-side so models cannot bypass them.
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity: get_problem_details retrieves specific problem info, get_submission_status checks submission results, list_my_submissions shows user's submission history, list_problems lists available problems, and submit_code submits new code. The boundaries are well-defined and non-overlapping.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: get_problem_details, get_submission_status, list_my_submissions, list_problems, and submit_code. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for an online judge domain. Each tool earns its place by covering core workflows: browsing problems, getting details, submitting code, and checking results. The count is neither too thin nor excessive for the purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the essential CRUD-like operations for an online judge: list and get for problems, create (submit) for submissions, and get for submission status. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to delete or cancel submissions, but agents can work around this, and core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources