mark_order_shipped
Update order status to shipped by providing the order ID. Enables accurate fulfillment tracking.
Instructions
标记订单为已发货状态
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | 订单ID |
Update order status to shipped by providing the order ID. Enables accurate fulfillment tracking.
标记订单为已发货状态
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | 订单ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It discloses it marks order as shipped but omits side effects, permissions, idempotency, or behavior if already shipped. Minimal disclosure for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Appropriate length for a simple action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity, description is minimal but lacks error handling, state requirements, and integration with sibling tools. No output schema means return value expectations are absent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one clearly described parameter. The parameter description '订单ID' adds little beyond schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '标记订单为已发货状态' clearly indicates the action (mark) and resource (order) with the state change (shipped), distinguishing it from sibling tools like cancel_order or create_order.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or conditions. For example, it doesn't mention you need an existing order or that shipping labels should already be bought.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/waka4674/shipsaving-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server