get_order_detail
Need order details? Provide the order ID to get complete shipping and order information.
Instructions
查看订单详细信息
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | 订单ID |
Need order details? Provide the order ID to get complete shipping and order information.
查看订单详细信息
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | 订单ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must carry behavioral transparency, but it only says 'view details', omitting any mention of side effects, permissions, rate limits, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Description is a single short sentence, but it is under-specified rather than concise; it adds no value beyond the name.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should explain what data is returned but fails to do so. Also lacks behavioral context, making it incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes the order_id parameter. Baseline score of 3 applies as description adds no further meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description '查看订单详细信息' merely restates the tool name 'get_order_detail' without adding specificity or distinguishing it from siblings like get_order_tags or search_orders.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search_orders or get_order_tags. No context or exclusions provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/waka4674/shipsaving-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server