A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA brutally honest code review tool powered by DeepSeek-R1 AI and the Model Context Protocol.
MIT
Cynical Sally
by w1ckedxt
Related Servers
Alternatives to Cynical Sally
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA ruthless, read-only code review MCP server that analyzes code produced by AI coding assistants, catching missing requirements, security vulnerabilities, edge cases, and performance issues without ever modifying files.19 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for AI-powered code review, research, and book writing via a fleet of coding agents.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn AI-powered MCP server that reviews code bluntly, without sugarcoating, citing line numbers and severity labels.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to review git changes using OpenAI Codex CLI, enabling code review of unstaged, staged, or last-commit changes.34 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides brutally honest, humorous code reviews for GitHub pull requests using Claude Haiku. Enables users to roast their PRs by fetching metadata and diffs via the GitHub CLI and returning severity-rated reviews with genuine compliments.2MIT
TDQS
A4.7/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a specific domain (ideas, code explanation, frontend, marketing, refactoring, PR reviews, general code review, usage) with clear boundaries. Overlaps are minimal and well-differentiated in descriptions.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the 'sally_{action_or_target}' pattern in lower_snake_case, providing a predictable and consistent naming convention across the set.
Tool Count5/5
Eight tools cover the core functionality of the cynical feedback server without being too few or too many, striking a good balance for the intended scope.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers key areas: idea critique, code explanation, frontend review, marketing review, refactoring, PR review, general code review, and usage tracking. No obvious gaps for the domain of cynical analysis.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive