ai-mcp-toolkit
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROQ_API_KEY | Yes | Your Groq API key for LLM access. | |
| TAVILY_API_KEY | Yes | Your Tavily API key for web search. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| web_researchA | Search the web for current information on a topic and return a concise summary with key points drawn from the results. |
| review_code_diffA | Review a code diff and return structured, actionable feedback. Pass raw diff text. Optionally specify a focus area like 'security'. |
| explain_conceptA | Explain a technical or AI concept tailored to a specific audience's background level, using concrete analogies. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a completely different function—concept explanation, code review, and web research—with no overlap in purpose or inputs. An agent would not confuse them.
Two tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (explain_concept, review_code_diff), but web_research reverses the order (noun_verb if 'research' is the verb) or could be read as noun_noun, breaking consistency.
With only 3 tools, the server feels minimal for a general-purpose AI toolkit. While the count itself is acceptable, the scope is too narrow to be considered well-rounded.
The tools are a random collection with no domain coherence. Missing fundamental AI capabilities like text generation, summarization, or image analysis, making the surface severely incomplete for a toolkit.