Skip to main content
Glama
vyavahare-kishor

ai-mcp-toolkit

by vyavahare-kishor
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-mcp-toolkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-web-calc

      tickernelz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables web searching, URL content extraction, and summarization without requiring API keys. It also provides advanced mathematical evaluation and multi-language Wikipedia summary retrieval tools.
      5
      362 npm
      6
      MIT

    • mcp-server-toolkit

      isamkhan1809
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server providing 8 tools for file operations, shell command execution, web search and fetching, plus AI-powered code review and text summarization, with built-in security controls.
      -

    • Friday MCP Server

      JeremyLakeyJr
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that enables research (web search, URL fetch, news), workspace management (file operations, command execution), and self-extension via markdown-based skills.
      21
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a completely different function—concept explanation, code review, and web research—with no overlap in purpose or inputs. An agent would not confuse them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (explain_concept, review_code_diff), but web_research reverses the order (noun_verb if 'research' is the verb) or could be read as noun_noun, breaking consistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels minimal for a general-purpose AI toolkit. While the count itself is acceptable, the scope is too narrow to be considered well-rounded.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools are a random collection with no domain coherence. Missing fundamental AI capabilities like text generation, summarization, or image analysis, making the surface severely incomplete for a toolkit.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources