obtener_sumario_seccion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only states that results are ordered by category. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, if authentication is needed, rate limits, pagination, or what happens when no results are found. This is insufficient for a tool with no behavioral hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loads the action and result. Every part is relevant, but it could be slightly more structured with separate details on ordering or usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 2 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimally adequate. It explains what the tool does but lacks details on return structure, edge cases, or prerequisites. For a simple tool, it suffices but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds minor value by noting ordering by 'rubro/tema', which is not in the schema. It does not provide additional syntax or format details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Obtiene' (Gets) and resource 'sumario de avisos publicados en una sección específica para una fecha dada' and mentions ordering 'ordenados por rubro/tema'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'obtener_sumario_del_dia', though the name and parameter suggest section-specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when needing a summary of notices for a specific section and date, including ordering. It provides no guidance on when not to use this tool, nor does it mention alternative tools like 'obtener_sumario_del_dia' for a full day summary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.