obtener_sumario_del_dia

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It states a read operation ('obtiene'), which is clear. However, it does not disclose any behavioral details such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or what happens with invalid dates beyond the schema's default behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose. It is front-loaded with the main action and contains no superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter, no output schema), the description adequately conveys what it returns (complete unified summary grouped by rubros). It could specify the output format (e.g., JSON, HTML), but the domain context implies a structured text. Overall, it is fairly complete for its purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'fecha' described in the schema. The description does not add additional meaning or context about the parameter beyond what the schema already provides, so it meets the baseline of 3 for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'gets the complete and unified summary of the four sections of the Official Gazette for a given day, grouped by headings.' It distinguishes from siblings like obtener_sumario_seccion (likely one section) and buscar_avisos (search specific notices).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when needing a full day's summary, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives like search tools. No exclusions or when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.