Skip to main content
Glama

delete_report

Destructive

Permanently remove a generated report instance from Aria Operations while preserving its definition and schedules. Preview by default; set confirmed=true to irreversibly delete using a valid report UUID.

Instructions

[WRITE] Permanently delete a generated report artifact from Aria Operations. Removes only the generated report instance and its output — the report definition and any schedules remain intact; re-run generate_report to recreate it. Deletion is irreversible and is recorded in the audit log. Returns an error if the report_id does not exist; use list_reports to find valid UUIDs first. Default confirmed=False returns a preview without deleting.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
targetNoAria target name from config; default when omitted.
confirmedNoMust be True to actually delete. Default False = preview only.
report_idYesThe report UUID to delete (from generate_report or list_reports).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.10.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / confirmed / description
      Added value: +"Must be True to actually delete. Default False = preview only."
    • addedInput schema / properties / report_id / description
      Added value: +"The report UUID to delete (from generate_report or list_reports)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"Aria target name from config; default when omitted."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.5.38
    • addedInput schema / properties / confirmed
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": false,
      +  "title": "Confirmed",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Addedv1.5.29
  4. Removedv1.5.28
  5. Addedv1.5.18

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond the annotations by disclosing that deletion is irreversible, is recorded in the audit log, returns an error for invalid report_id, and defaults to a non-destructive preview unless confirmed=True. It also clarifies exactly what is and is not removed, which is critical for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every sentence adds essential information: what is deleted, what survives, irreversibility, audit logging, error behavior, and the preview default. The [WRITE] prefix and front-loaded main action make it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, non-idempotent tool with no output schema, the description covers the critical operational context: preconditions (list_reports), consequences (permanent deletion, audit log), and safety mechanism (confirmed flag). An agent has enough information to invoke it correctly and understand the side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes all three parameters with full coverage, including the confirmed flag and report_id semantics. The description reinforces these details (e.g., confirmed=False means preview, report_id must be a valid UUID) but does not add substantial new parameter-level meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Permanently delete a generated report artifact from Aria Operations.' It distinguishes the report instance from the report definition and schedules, which differentiates this from sibling tools like delete_alert_definition and get_report.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance: use list_reports to find valid UUIDs first, use generate_report to recreate the artifact, and note that confirmed=False only previews the deletion. This clearly communicates when and how to invoke the tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.