create-organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It does add useful context by specifying the HTTP method and required OAuth scope (sales:write), which implies a mutating operation. However, it does not disclose side effects, reversibility, validation failures, or response behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence that includes the action, endpoint, and required scope. Every part earns its place, with no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple three-parameter create operation, the endpoint and scope provide essential calling context. However, with no annotations and no output schema, the agent is left without any indication of the response shape, error cases, or side effects, so the description is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33%, so the description needs to compensate for missing parameter context. It adds no information about the name, email, or phone parameters beyond what the schema already states. The schema defines the name field minimally and leaves email and phone largely undocumented in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Create a sales organization,' and includes the exact endpoint (POST /api/public/sales/organizations). This clearly differentiates it from sibling tools like update-organization, get-organization, and list-organizations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for creating a new sales organization, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer it over update-organization or list-organizations. The 'Scope: sales:write' line gives a useful precondition, but there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.