macos-control-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to macos-control-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancemacOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStandalone MCP server that gives AI agents full GUI control over macOS — screenshots, mouse, keyboard, apps, clipboard, and multi-display — with zero private dependencies.19MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnterprise-grade macOS MCP server that gives AI agents eyes, hands, and a terminal, enabling screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, shell commands, and file operations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn experimental MCP server providing full control over the macOS user interface through mouse, keyboard, and window management tools. It enables AI assistants to automate desktop tasks by utilizing native accessibility APIs and OCR for real-time screen comprehension.7Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that bridges AI agents and macOS, enabling automation of file navigation, application control, UI interaction, browser automation, and system operations.184MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThe first open-source MCP server that enables AI to fully control remote macOS systems.8491MIT
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Mouse, keyboard, window, and clipboard tools are clearly distinct, but the screen/UI inspection space is crowded with overlapping tools like screenshot, screenshot_annotated, accessibility_tree, ai_screen_context, ai_screen_elements, ai_web_elements, and ai_ocr_region. Descriptions try to differentiate them, but an agent could easily pick the wrong one.
All names use snake_case and domain prefixes, giving a readable structure. However, the verb/noun ordering is inconsistent: some are resource_action (mouse_move, window_resize), some are action_resource (terminal_execute, clipboard_read), and some are plain nouns (screenshot, screen_info, apps_list).
36 tools is well past the 25+ threshold for being considered heavy, and several are non-essential or overlapping, especially the five animation tools and the many AI/accessibility screen-inspection tools. The core capability could be covered with a tighter set.
The surface covers most macOS control needs: mouse input, keyboard input, screenshots, terminal execution, window management, app listing, clipboard access, and accessibility-tree inspection. Minor gaps like explicit app launch/quit or raw key-up/key-down events are workaroundable via terminal_execute or existing tools.