get_post
Retrieve a specific social post and its per-platform publish results by providing the post ID.
Instructions
Read one post by id, including its per-platform publish results.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes |
Retrieve a specific social post and its per-platform publish results by providing the post ID.
Read one post by id, including its per-platform publish results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. States it's a read operation, but lacks detail on potential side effects, rate limits, or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, 12 words, front-loaded with key information. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with one param and no output schema, description covers purpose and what it returns (per-platform results). Lacks mention of return format, but schema doesn't exist.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only parameter postId has no schema description (0% coverage). Description adds 'by id' which is redundant; no info on format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb (Read), resource (post), and additional detail (per-platform publish results). Distinguishes from siblings like list_posts (list multiple), create_post, update_post, delete_post.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: use when needing a single post with detailed publish results, but no explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/viralnote/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server