delete_media
Permanently remove a media library item. This action cannot be undone.
Instructions
Delete a media library item. Irreversible.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mediaId | Yes |
Permanently remove a media library item. This action cannot be undone.
Delete a media library item. Irreversible.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mediaId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It mentions 'Irreversible', which is crucial for a delete operation, but does not disclose potential side effects, permission requirements, or whether the action cascades to related data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with two sentences. It front-loads the action and resource, and includes a key behavioral note. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with one parameter, the description covers the basic purpose and irreversibility. However, it lacks parameter semantics and usage context, which are needed for full completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not mention the single parameter 'mediaId'. The description fails to explain what mediaId represents or how to obtain it, leaving the agent without necessary guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Delete', the resource 'media library item', and adds a critical behavioral trait 'Irreversible'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like delete_post or delete_webhook by specifying the resource type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_post, delete_webhook). It does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/viralnote/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server