Skip to main content
Glama
vingupta3

E2E Networks Cloud & TIR MCP Server

by vingupta3

Related Servers

Alternatives to E2E Networks Cloud & TIR MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with natural language control over AWS, Azure, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud infrastructure through dynamic API discovery and execution. Supports 51,900+ cloud operations and includes OpenTofu integration for complete infrastructure lifecycle management.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, evaluate, and provision cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP, and Azure with cross-cloud normalization, cost comparisons, and deployable execution kits.
      5
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Cloud infrastructure provisioning via natural language. Enables deploying production-ready infrastructure on AWS, GCP, Azure, or Oracle with a single prompt.
      12
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage VNG Cloud infrastructure including compute, storage, networking, and Kubernetes resources through natural language commands.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (nodes, databases, k8s, volumes, buckets, VPCs, reserved IPs, TIR notebooks), so selection is generally clear. Minor overlap exists between e2e_get_node and e2e_get_node_health, and the catch-all e2e_raw_request could in principle shadow every other tool, but the descriptions keep boundaries readable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow an e2e_ prefix with a predictable verb_noun pattern (list_nodes, get_node, create_volume, delete_bucket), plus a consistent e2e_tir_ namespace for AI tools. A few names invert to noun_action (e2e_node_action, e2e_database_action, e2e_action_reserved_ip), a minor deviation but still predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    46 tools is heavy by count (normally warranting a low score), but the server spans a genuinely large cloud domain (compute, networking, storage, DBaaS, k8s, billing, and a full AI/ML platform). Spread across these services it is roughly 4-5 tools each, so it is borderline rather than excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    Several domains are read-only with no lifecycle operations: load balancers, security groups, k8s clusters, and SFS offer only list/get with no create/delete. Compute and database flows are well covered, and the e2e_raw_request escape hatch plus credential/connection tools mitigate the gaps, but the surface is uneven.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues