Metallum MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Metallum MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to fetch music artist, album, and track metadata, search tracks, discover similar artists, and list top tracks, tags, charts, and user listening stats through MCP tools.391 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes Metacritic game, movie, TV, and music review data through MCP tools and resources, enabling LLM hosts to search and retrieve reviews with optional filters.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to search and retrieve anime, manga, and forum data from the MyAnimeList API v2, including details, rankings, seasonal anime, and user lists via natural language tool calls.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes Steam Web API tools as MCP resources for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and Gemini CLI, enabling profile lookups, game searches, achievement tracking, and more.1120 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables extracting metadata from Beatport track URLs, including preview audio, cover art, and track info, via an MCP server integrated with Claude Desktop.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceThis is a 93-tool Spotify MCP server for Claude, Cursor, and any MCP client. Smart shuffle, vibe analysis, natural language search, artist networks, and more.939MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, helped by descriptions that cross-reference each other (e.g. get_band vs get_band_bio, get_band_reviews vs browse_reviews). Mild overlap exists between browse_bands and search_bands, and the many band-centric getters could briefly confuse, but each targets a different facet.
Nearly all tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, browse_, list_). Only random_band deviates by omitting a verb, a minor inconsistency in an otherwise predictable scheme.
21 tools is on the high side for the typical 3-15 range, but the breadth of the Metallum domain (artists, bands, albums, songs, lyrics, reviews, labels, upcoming, RIP) justifies most of them. Each tool appears to cover a distinct retrieval need, so the count is slightly heavy but reasonable.
The read-only surface is comprehensive: artists, bands, albums, songs, lyrics, reviews, labels, countries, upcoming releases, and RIP lists are all covered. Minor gaps include no dedicated search_artists or search_labels, and get_artist does not explicitly return associated bands, but these are workable omissions.