Veris
Related Servers
Alternatives to Veris
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAutonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI. Its MCP server exposes 34 tools over stdio: project state and task-queue ops, memory retrieve/store, code search, quality and verification reports, repo hotspots/co-changes, and structured findings/learnings.13,524 npm1,088Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that lets coding agents test AI agents. Create YAML test cases, snapshot golden baselines, check for regressions, and generate visual reports all from inside Claude Code or any MCP-compatible tool. Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI, Claude, Mistral, and any HTTP API.1057 npm543 PyPI137Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to enforce spec-driven development and verify code before it is marked done, using six tools that catch invented APIs, scan for hallucinated content, check plugin conformance, sandbox-run tests, validate schemas, and record audit evidence.771 npm8PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local, MIT-licensed AI test harness with 10 MCP tools and 11 prompts for risk-based testing, accessibility checks, quality maps, evidence, and interactive reports. Runs over stdio against an explicitly configured project folder; uses the host AI coding agent, with no hosted backend or runtime telemetry.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenancePortable MCP memory server giving AI agents persistent, verified, cross-session memory. 30 tools, SQLite + cloud sync, Chrome Extension for every AI chat platform. The only JavaScript MCP memory server. Includes behavioral learning engine, semantic search, knowledge scoping, session quality scoring, and web dashboard.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives your AI coding agent a bounded map of an unfamiliar TypeScript SaaS repo: where the code lives, what's risky to touch, and where the money / auth / user flows are. Provides eight MCP tools for orientation, task focus, risk assessment, and SaaS-specific observations without AST or type checking.14 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Tool purposes are mostly distinct and clearly described, with analyze_* and generate_* prefixes differentiating targets. A few names like cross_repo_snapshot vs analyze_repository could require reading descriptions, but overlap is minimal.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (register_repo, analyze_repository, list_workflows), but several are noun phrases (cross_repo_snapshot, confidence_history, node_history) and one is a question phrase (what_if_revert). The pattern is readable but not fully consistent.
At 17 tools, the surface is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool addresses a distinct part of the verification workflow. The count feels a bit heavy yet justifiable for the domain.
The toolset covers setup, analysis, planning, reporting, history, and onboarding comprehensively. It lacks an obvious direct 'execute verification' tool, but the server appears focused on planning, analysis, and evidence recording rather than test execution.