Saves the active FigCraft document to disk as a .figcraft file, using an optional custom path or defaulting to the file's original location.
Simpan dokumen aktif di FigCraft ke disk (.figcraft).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | No | Path berkas penyimpanan (opsional, default: path berkas saat dibuka) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It only says the active document is saved to disk; it does not mention overwrite behavior, required active-document state, permission needs, or error conditions, which are important for a write operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted wording. It is efficient, though its brevity contributes to the gaps in usage and behavioral detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter save tool with no output schema, the description covers the core action adequately. However, with no annotations, it should disclose more about save semantics such as overwriting and default path behavior to be fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents the optional 'path' parameter and its default behavior. The description adds no further parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides, which matches the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: saving the active FigCraft document to disk as '.figcraft'. This distinguishes it from read-oriented siblings such as figcraft_open_file, but it does not explicitly name or differentiate itself from related save/open workflows.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies the save action but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as figcraft_open_file or create_and_open. No prerequisites, exclusions, or conditions for invocation are stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.