Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agenda Intelligence

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that provides AI assistants access to stock market data including financial statements, stock prices, and market news through a Model Context Protocol interface.
    11
    2,301
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP implementation that integrates the Brave Search API, providing comprehensive search capabilities including web, local business, image, video, news searches, and AI-powered summarization.
    6
    8
    25,693 npm
    1,491
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Real-time and historical oil, gas, and commodity prices. 40+ energy commodities including Brent Crude, WTI, Natural Gas, LBMA Gold/Silver, EU Carbon, and refined products. Get current prices, compare commodities, view market overviews, and access historical data — all through natural language. Used by energy traders, fintech companies, and researchers worldwide.
    32
    359 npm
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Self-hostable MCP server for WhisperGraph — a graph of 7.39B nodes / 39B edges mapping DNS, BGP, GeoIP, WHOIS, and threat intelligence. Six read-only tools (Cypher query + schema introspection + threat assessment), six resources, eight investigation prompts. stdio and Streamable HTTP transports.
    8
    45 npm
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Self-hosted financial data terminal for AI agents. Scrapes and serves SEC filings (full-text search), 13F institutional holdings, insider and congressional trades, FINRA short data, FRED economic indicators, CFTC futures positioning, VIX/put-call ratios, and daily stock prices over MCP.
    230
    AGPL 3.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to search and reference trusted, out-of-band ingested source state, run claim-bound document reviews, validate evidence-status proposals against admissibility guards, and build evidence matrices. It keeps proposal, evidence, admissibility, and adjudication separate so agents can propose epistemic statuses without creating the source facts, page locators, provenance, or missingness records that support them.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to turn OpenSpec intents and Git changes into revision-bound proofs by planning, selecting, and running the smallest safe protection set, then verifying composite verdicts and explaining evidence or unresolved states.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to query permission-filtered world views, inspect evidence-backed signals, and trace timelines across integrated enterprise systems, handing deep investigation off to vertical MCP servers via verified capabilities.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to route goals across multiple independent APIs, enforce constraints, reject invalid evidence, and return verified outcomes with tamper-evident receipts.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides read-only knowledge search and guarded action proposal tools. Write-like actions require human approval and return traceable evidence with policy events.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 32 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Several tools share the same evidence-verification surface (validate_evidence, check_evidence_packet, audit_claims, grounded_check, verify_claims, verify_quotes, agent_output_verification) and differ mainly in subtle output modes, so an agent can easily pick the wrong validation tool. The vertical risk tools are more distinct, but the core cluster causes real misselection risk.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names use snake_case, and most follow an action_noun pattern (get_protocol, validate_brief, list_lenses). However, the vertical triage tools use bare domain-noun phrases (middle_corridor_deal_risk, gulf_maritime_exposure), creating a minor convention split.

Tool Count2/5

32 tools is above the threshold where a set feels heavy, and many are validation/verification variants that could be consolidated. The reserved deep_dive placeholder adds a non-functional tool, further inflating the count.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows have create/validate/check coverage for briefs, evidence packs, and memos, plus lenses, signals, source planning, and vertical screens. However, evidence mutation is append-only (no update/remove/delete), briefs and memos have no update/delete tools, and deep_dive is an explicit dead-end placeholder.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week