Skip to main content
Glama

Agenda Intelligence MD

by io.github.vassiliylakhonin
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Server Details

Evidence-readiness MCP server: validate, audit, and score briefs, memos, and evidence packs.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Uptime
100.0% over 37 days
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
Repository
vassiliylakhonin/agenda-intelligence-md
GitHub Stars
8
Server Listing
Agenda Intelligence

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly stated as escrow arbitration and delivery verification, so an agent can easily identify its function.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a descriptive snake_case pattern (m2m_escrow_arbitration_ruling), which is internally consistent. With no other tools to compare, consistency is trivially achieved.

Tool Count3/5

The server offers only 1 tool, which feels thin for a domain that likely involves multiple operations (e.g., escrow creation, funding, settlement). However, the tool itself is complex and self-contained, so it's not egregiously inappropriate.

Completeness2/5

The tool only performs arbitration ruling and explicitly does not handle settlement or clearance. For a complete escrow lifecycle, tools for creating escrows, submitting deliveries, raising disputes, and executing settlements would be expected. Significant gaps exist.

Available Tools

1 tool
m2m_escrow_arbitration_rulingA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Deterministic dispute arbitration and delivery verification for Agent-to-Agent escrow transactions. Checks supplied hashes, supported offline JSON schemas and deadlines, proposing allocations for human review. No settlement or clearance is issued. Required tool arguments: request. Grades supplied evidence; it does not independently verify source truth. Obtain the source records requested by inputSchema before asking for a decision-ready result. Do not fabricate missing evidence. Illustrative example arguments (synthetic; replace with your own data): {"request":{"escrow_id":"escrow-m2m-sample-001","dispute_claim":{"claimant":"buyer","reason":"Contract deliverable dispute"},"deal_terms":{"buyer_id":"did:agent:0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111","seller_id":"did:agent:0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222","amount_usd":500,"currency":"USDC","deadline_utc":"2026-09-17T18:00:00Z","arbitration_policy":"pro_rata","arbitration_fee_pct":1},"specification":{"deliverable_type":"json_data","min_valid_records_pct":95},"delivery_submission":{"submitted_at":"2026-09-17T12:00:00Z","telemetry":{"total_items":1000,"valid_items":1000,"response_time_ms":320}}}}. Evaluation requires a signed Base USDC payment for the exact request, or Pro access. Discovery is free. Keep the original request and X-Payment-Signature for result recovery within 24 hours. Current prices: https://m2m-escrow-arbiter-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev/.well-known/x402. Do not pay automatically. Evidence triage only: no factual-truth verification, no legal, compliance, sanctions, or financial advice. Human review is required before any commercial action.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
requestYesStructured request object. Full contract: https://github.com/vassiliylakhonin/agenda-intelligence-md/blob/main/schemas/v1/m2m-escrow-arbiter-request.schema.json

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription

No output parameters

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds substantial context beyond them: no settlement is issued, this is evidence triage only with no factual-truth verification, grades supplied evidence rather than independently verifying source truth, requires x402 payment, and results are recoverable for 24 hours with the original request and signature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core purpose and negative scope before logistics. The synthetic example and payment/disclaimer details all earn their place, but the passage is long and the disclaimers repeat the 'no verification / human review' theme more than once, costing some tightness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex tool with a nested request object backed by an external schema and an existing output schema, the description covers prerequisites, payment, scope limits, and evidence-handling rules adequately; return values need not be explained since an output schema exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter with 100% schema description coverage whose schema is an external contract link, so the baseline is 3. The description significantly compensates by supplying a full illustrative, nested example argument showing escrow_id, dispute_claim, deal_terms, specification, and delivery_submission structure, which goes well beyond the terse schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: deterministic dispute arbitration and delivery verification for A2A escrow transactions. It also delineates scope precisely by declaring what it does NOT do (no settlement or clearance is issued), so an agent knows exactly where the tool's authority ends.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states prerequisites ('Obtain the source records requested by inputSchema before asking for a decision-ready result'), prohibitions ('Do not fabricate missing evidence'), payment conditions ('requires a signed Base USDC payment... or Pro access; Discovery is free'), and that human review is required before commercial action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Changedm2m_escrow_arbitration_ruling1 field changed
      • changedOutput schema / (root)
        Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "description": "Response contract for delivery-evidence review. Unverified delivery requires human review and cannot authorize settlement.",
+      "properties": {
+        "arbitration_ruling": {
+          "properties": {
+            "check_status": {
+              "additionalProperties": {
+                "enum": [
+                  "passed",
+                  "failed",
+                  "not_evaluated",
+                  "not_applicable"
+                ]
+              },
+              "type": "object"
+            },
+            "checks": {
+              "properties": {
+                "deadline_honored": {
+                  "type": "boolean"
+                },
+                "hash_verified": {
+                  "type": "boolean"
+                },
+                "schema_verified": {
+                  "type": "boolean"
+                },
+                "slo_verified": {
+                  "type": "boolean"
+                }
+              },
+              "required": [
+                "deadline_honored",
+                "hash_verified",
+                "schema_verified",
+                "slo_verified"
+              ],
+              "type": "object"
+            },
+            "escrow_id": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "evaluation_scope": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "evidence_gaps": {
+              "items": {
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              "type": "array"
+            },
+            "execution_advisory": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "payout_breakdown": {
+              "properties": {
+                "arbiter_fee_usd": {
+                  "type": "number"
+                },
+                "buyer_refund_usd": {
+                  "type": "number"
+                },
+                "seller_payout_usd": {
+                  "type": "number"
+                },
+                "total_escrow_usd": {
+                  "type": "number"
+                }
+              },
+              "required": [
+                "total_escrow_usd",
+                "seller_payout_usd",
+                "buyer_refund_usd",
+                "arbiter_fee_usd"
+              ],
+              "type": "object"
+            },
+            "ruling": {
+              "enum": [
+                "RELEASE_TO_SELLER",
+                "REFUND_TO_BUYER",
+                "PARTIAL_SETTLEMENT",
+                "ESCALATE_HUMAN"
+              ],
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "score": {
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "settlement_authorized": {
+              "const": false,
+              "type": "boolean"
+            },
+            "status": {
+              "enum": [
+                "decision_ready",
+                "not_decision_ready",
+                "escalate"
+              ],
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "violations": {
+              "items": {
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              "type": "array"
+            },
+            "vizier_clearance_receipt": {
+              "type": [
+                "string",
+                "null"
+              ]
+            },
+            "vizier_status": {
+              "type": "string"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "status",
+            "ruling",
+            "score",
+            "escrow_id",
+            "payout_breakdown",
+            "checks",
+            "violations",
+            "evidence_gaps"
+          ],
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "contract_version": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "profile": {
+          "const": "m2m_escrow_arbiter",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "contract_version",
+        "profile",
+        "arbitration_ruling"
+      ],
+      "title": "M2MEscrowArbiterResponse",
+      "type": "object",
+      "x-schema-version": "1"
+    },
+    {
+      "properties": {
+        "artifacts": {
+          "items": {
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "id": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "metadata": {
+          "properties": {
+            "human_review_required": {
+              "const": true
+            },
+            "response": {
+              "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+              "additionalProperties": false,
+              "description": "Response contract for delivery-evidence review. Unverified delivery requires human review and cannot authorize settlement.",
+              "properties": {
+                "arbitration_ruling": {
+                  "properties": {
+                    "check_status": {
+                      "additionalProperties": {
+                        "enum": [
+                          "passed",
+                          "failed",
+                          "not_evaluated",
+                          "not_applicable"
+                        ]
+                      },
+                      "type": "object"
+                    },
+                    "checks": {
+                      "properties": {
+                        "deadline_honored": {
+                          "type": "boolean"
+                        },
+                        "hash_verified": {
+                          "type": "boolean"
+                        },
+                        "schema_verified": {
+                          "type": "boolean"
+                        },
+                        "slo_verified": {
+                          "type": "boolean"
+                        }
+                      },
+                      "required": [
+                        "deadline_honored",
+                        "hash_verified",
+                        "schema_verified",
+                        "slo_verified"
+                      ],
+                      "type": "object"
+                    },
+                    "escrow_id": {
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "evaluation_scope": {
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "evidence_gaps": {
+                      "items": {
+                        "type": "string"
+                      },
+                      "type": "array"
+                    },
+                    "execution_advisory": {
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "payout_breakdown": {
+                      "properties": {
+                        "arbiter_fee_usd": {
+                          "type": "number"
+                        },
+                        "buyer_refund_usd": {
+                          "type": "number"
+                        },
+                        "seller_payout_usd": {
+                          "type": "number"
+                        },
+                        "total_escrow_usd": {
+                          "type": "number"
+                        }
+                      },
+                      "required": [
+                        "total_escrow_usd",
+                        "seller_payout_usd",
+                        "buyer_refund_usd",
+                        "arbiter_fee_usd"
+                      ],
+                      "type": "object"
+                    },
+                    "ruling": {
+                      "enum": [
+                        "RELEASE_TO_SELLER",
+                        "REFUND_TO_BUYER",
+                        "PARTIAL_SETTLEMENT",
+                        "ESCALATE_HUMAN"
+                      ],
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "score": {
+                      "type": "integer"
+                    },
+                    "settlement_authorized": {
+                      "const": false,
+                      "type": "boolean"
+                    },
+                    "status": {
+                      "enum": [
+                        "decision_ready",
+                        "not_decision_ready",
+                        "escalate"
+                      ],
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "violations": {
+                      "items": {
+                        "type": "string"
+                      },
+                      "type": "array"
+                    },
+                    "vizier_clearance_receipt": {
+                      "type": [
+                        "string",
+                        "null"
+                      ]
+                    },
+                    "vizier_status": {
+                      "type": "string"
+                    }
+                  },
+                  "required": [
+                    "status",
+                    "ruling",
+                    "score",
+                    "escrow_id",
+                    "payout_breakdown",
+                    "checks",
+                    "violations",
+                    "evidence_gaps"
+                  ],
+                  "type": "object"
+                },
+                "contract_version": {
+                  "type": "string"
+                },
+                "profile": {
+                  "const": "m2m_escrow_arbiter",
+                  "type": "string"
+                }
+              },
+              "required": [
+                "contract_version",
+                "profile",
+                "arbitration_ruling"
+              ],
+              "title": "M2MEscrowArbiterResponse",
+              "type": "object",
+              "x-schema-version": "1"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "response",
+            "human_review_required"
+          ],
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "status": {
+          "properties": {
+            "state": {
+              "type": "string"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "state"
+          ],
+          "type": "object"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "id",
+        "status",
+        "artifacts",
+        "metadata"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  ],
+  "title": "M2MEscrowArbiterResponseMcpCompatibility",
+  "type": "object"
+}
  2. 2 tool updates
    • Removeddual_use_technology_export
    • Addedm2m_escrow_arbitration_ruling
  3. 1 tool update
    • First observeddual_use_technology_export

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • ProofGate

    yuzhiyang1
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Evidence-first delivery audit MCP server that evaluates task requirements against delivery evidence and returns a reproducible pass/needs_review/fail decision with a deterministic receipt.
    MIT

  • tru8-mcp

    SamYatesSmith
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for Tru8 Evidence Research that enables AI agents to submit claims or URLs and receive source-traced evidence organized by tier and type with element decomposition and relationship mapping.
    3
    39 PyPI
    MIT

  • hivelaw

    srotzin
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI compliance auditing. Scores agent outputs for hallucination liability under the EU AI Act, issues verifiable compliance stamps, and tracks audit history by agent.
    MIT
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources