getSuite

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states 'Retrieves details' implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose what 'details' include, nor any side effects, authentication, or rate limiting. Minimal behavioral information beyond the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is very short with one English sentence and one Japanese translation. It is efficient and front-loaded, though the Japanese duplication may not be useful for English-only agents. Still, it wastes no words and is appropriate for a simple retrieval tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so description should help with return expectations, but it only says 'details' without specifying what fields are returned. The tool is simple and siblings suggest standard output, but more detail would improve completeness for an agent without prior knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter 'suiteId' is fully described in the input schema with type and description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3, and description provides no additional value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves details of a specific test suite by ID. Verb 'retrieves' and resource 'details of a specific test suite' are explicit, and the method 'by ID' differentiates from siblings like 'getSuites' (plural) and 'addSuite'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives like 'getSuites' (which lists all suites). Usage is implied: use when you know a specific suite ID. No when-not or alternative mentions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.