Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-verify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 142 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Many tools are exact or near-exact duplicates because v1.9.5 consolidated older tools into mode-based umbrella tools but left the old standalone tools registered (e.g., browser_errors vs browser_errors_aggregate, browser_flow mode=chain vs browser_chain, browser_visual vs browser_visual_compare, security_scan vs security_headers_check). Audit and check tools also heavily overlap (browser_full_audit, browser_smoke_test, browser_visual_check, browser_a11y_check, lighthouse_audit, validation_check). An agent cannot reliably select between deprecated and current variants.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The dominant pattern is readable snake_case with domain prefixes and verb_action names (browser_*, validation_*, security_*, skill_*), and mode-based umbrella tools mostly follow that convention. However, the pattern is diluted by bare noun tools (browser_artifacts, browser_state, evidence, contract), unprefixed outliers (api_probe, screenshot_diff, css_var_check, bypass_login), and deprecated standalone names that no longer match the consolidated naming scheme.

    Tool Count1/5

    142 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, and the list is inflated by deprecated aliases, standalone versions of merged tools, and multiple overlapping audit/check capabilities. This imposes a heavy selection and context burden on agents and should be reduced to a focused set of roughly 30-40 unique capabilities organized via mode parameters.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the verification domain remarkably broadly: browser lifecycle, interaction, assertion, error/network diagnostics, visual regression, performance, accessibility, security scanning, API contracts, evidence, trace correlation, session management, and MCP self-checks are all present. Minor gaps or workarounds exist (e.g., no standalone browser_assert tool, no direct storage clearing without browser_eval), but no major workflow dead end is apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues