list_activation_keys

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return format (list of objects with key and description) and states no inputs. With no annotations provided, it does not mention side effects, authentication, or pagination, but for a simple read-only list, it is minimally sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short, purposeful sentences with no extraneous information. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, then details inputs and outputs efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters and the presence of an output schema (as per context), the description adequately covers the return format. There are no missing details for a simple list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so the description does not need to add parameter meaning. A score of 4 is appropriate as the baseline for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'activation keys', and specifies the scope 'available to the current user'. It distinguishes from sibling tools (which deal with systems, groups, updates) by focusing on a unique resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving the user's activation keys. It does not provide explicit when-to-use or alternatives, but given the unique purpose and zero parameters, it is clear and adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.