find_systems_by_ip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must reveal behavioral traits. It notes that 'limit is capped at 500', which is a constraint, and describes the return format. However, it omits authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. Adequate but incomplete for a read-only tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise: one sentence for purpose, one listing inputs and constraints, one for returns. No unnecessary words, efficient structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (3 params, output schema exists), the description covers the main aspects: purpose, inputs, a constraint (limit cap), and return structure. Could mention pagination or error handling, but overall complete enough for use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It lists parameters (ip_address, limit, offset) and explains the limit cap, adding meaning beyond the schema. However, it does not explain the format of ip_address or the behavior of offset, leaving gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool's purpose: find systems by IP address. It uses a specific verb 'Find' and resource 'systems by IP', distinguishing it from siblings like 'find_systems_by_name' and 'list_systems'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for IP-based search and mentions optional parameters (limit, offset) for pagination, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'find_systems_by_name' or 'list_systems'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.