get-sdwan-config
Fetch a specific SD-WAN configuration by its ID to retrieve detailed settings and parameters.
Instructions
Get a specific SD-WAN configuration by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | SD-WAN config ID |
Fetch a specific SD-WAN configuration by its ID to retrieve detailed settings and parameters.
Get a specific SD-WAN configuration by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | SD-WAN config ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint and openWorldHint; description adds no extra behavioral context such as return format or access restrictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with key information, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 1-param tool with annotations, description is adequate but lacks differentiation from similar siblings and does not hint at output expectations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and description adds no meaning beyond what the schema's 'id' parameter description already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'SD-WAN configuration by ID', but does not differentiate from sibling tools like get-sdwan-config-status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/unifi-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server