Skip to main content
Glama
us-all

datadog-mcp-server

send-dora-incident

Track change failure rate and MTTR by sending DORA incident events with service, severity, and timestamps.

Instructions

Send a DORA incident event for tracking change failure rate and MTTR

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
serviceYesService name affected by the incident. Example: my-api-service
nameNoIncident name or title
severityNoIncident severity. Example: SEV-1, SEV-2
environmentNoEnvironment name. Example: production
startedAtYesUnix timestamp (seconds) when incident started
finishedAtNoUnix timestamp (seconds) when incident was resolved
versionNoVersion that caused the incident
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and open world (openWorldHint=true), but description adds no further behavioral insights like idempotency, permissions, or side effects beyond 'Send'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 12 words, no unnecessary text. Front-loaded with the key action and purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Minimal description given 7 parameters, no output schema, and many siblings. Lacks details on return values, impact, or how this event integrates with DORA tracking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameter descriptions, so baseline 3 applies. Description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond what's already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states sending a DORA incident event for tracking change failure rate and MTTR. However, fails to differentiate from similar sibling tool 'create-incident', which also likely creates incidents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create-incident' or 'send-dora-deployment'. Lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/datadog-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server