Skip to main content
Glama
us-all

datadog-mcp-server

by us-all

send-dora-incident

Track change failure rate and MTTR by sending DORA incident events with service name and start time.

Instructions

Send a DORA incident event for tracking change failure rate and MTTR

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoIncident name or title
serviceYesService name affected by the incident. Example: my-api-service
versionNoVersion that caused the incident
severityNoIncident severity. Example: SEV-1, SEV-2
startedAtYesUnix timestamp (seconds) when incident started
finishedAtNoUnix timestamp (seconds) when incident was resolved
environmentNoEnvironment name. Example: production
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states the high-level purpose without mentioning authentication, side effects, or whether the event is persisted. Critical details missing for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words, but it is overly brief and lacks structure. It could benefit from more context without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the tool's behavior, return value, or how it differs from similar tools like 'create-incident'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter described in the input schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, aligning with the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the verb 'Send' and the resource 'DORA incident event', with a clear purpose for tracking change failure rate and MTTR. It distinguishes from sibling 'create-incident' by focusing on DORA metrics, but the verb 'send' is somewhat vague compared to 'create'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create-incident' or 'search-incidents'. The description does not specify context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/datadog-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server