get-network-device
Retrieve detailed information about a network device using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get detailed information about a specific network device by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deviceId | Yes | The device ID |
Retrieve detailed information about a network device using its unique ID.
Get detailed information about a specific network device by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deviceId | Yes | The device ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description lacks any behavioral details such as read-only status, authentication needs, rate limits, or what 'detailed information' entails.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with essential information, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool without an output schema, the description is minimal but adequate; however, it does not clarify return format or error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the only parameter 'deviceId', so the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'network device', and the scope 'by ID', distinguishing it from sibling tools like list-network-devices.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a device ID is known but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternatives like list-network-devices.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/datadog-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server