get-status-page
Retrieve a specific status page by its unique ID to view service health and incident details.
Instructions
Get a specific status page by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The status page ID |
Retrieve a specific status page by its unique ID to view service health and incident details.
Get a specific status page by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The status page ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and openWorldHint. The description adds no additional behavioral context such as authentication, rate limits, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly adequate but lacks mention of return value or any additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter description. The description adds no extra meaning beyond 'by ID' which is already in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'get' and resource 'status page', and specifies retrieval by ID. It is distinct from siblings like 'list-status-pages' and 'create-status-page'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when an ID is known, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'list-status-pages' for browsing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/datadog-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server