Bouyomi-chan MCP Server
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Bouyomi-chan MCP Serverread this text aloud with a female voice at normal speed"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Boyomi-chan MCP Server (Node.js version)
This is a server that uses the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to provide text-to-speech functionality using Bokuyomi-chan (a slow voice) to AI assistants. It is implemented in Node.js/TypeScript.
overview
This server is an MCP server that allows AI assistants such as Claude to use Boyomi-chan.
Related MCP server: MCP Simple AivisSpeech
function
Text to speech
Select voice type (female, male, etc.)
Volume adjustment
Adjustable speech speed
Pitch Adjustment
Prerequisites
Node.js 16 or higher
npm 7 or higher
Boyomi-chan must be installed.
The HTTP link for Boyomi-chan is running on port 50080.
How to install
Clone this repository:
git clone https://github.com/uraoz/bouyomichan-mcp-nodejs.git
cd bouyomichan-mcp-nodejsInstall the dependencies:
npm installWhich compiles:
npm run buildHow to use
Starting the Server
npm startIntegration with Claude for Desktop
To work with Claude for Desktop you need to edit the configuration file:
Open the Claude for Desktop configuration file:
MacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Add the following content (replace the paths with the actual file paths):
{
"mcpServers": {
"bouyomi": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/絶対パス/bouyomichan-mcp-nodejs/build/index.js"
]
}
}
}Restart Claude for Desktop.
Usage Example
Claude for Desktop will read text aloud to you by:
Read out "Hello, World"
A male voice reads out "This is a test."
Speed up and read "I'm in a hurry"
Parameter Description
Parameters | explanation | Default value | Scope |
text | Read text | Required | Any text |
voice | Audio Type | 0 (1 female) | 0: Female 1, 1: Male 1, 2: Female 2, ... |
volume | volume | -1 (default) | -1: default, 0-100: volume level |
speed | speed | -1 (default) | -1: default, 50-200: speed level |
tone | Pitch | -1 (default) | -1: default, 50-200: pitch level |
license
MIT
Available Tools
1 toolread_textB
テキストを棒読みちゃんで読み上げます
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions the reading happens 'with a monotone voice' which is useful behavioral context, but doesn't disclose other important traits: whether this is a synchronous or asynchronous operation, what happens with long texts, error conditions, or what the output actually is (audio file, playback, etc.). For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient Japanese sentence that directly states what the tool does. Every word earns its place: 'テキスト' (text), '棒読みちゃん' (monotone voice), '読み上げます' (reads aloud). No wasted words or unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no annotations, no output schema, and zero parameters, the description should provide more complete context. While it states the basic purpose, it doesn't explain what form the output takes (audio stream, file, immediate playback), performance limitations, or error handling. For a text-to-speech tool, this leaves significant gaps in understanding how to use it effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%. The description doesn't need to explain parameters, and it correctly implies text input through its purpose statement. Baseline for zero parameters with full schema coverage is 4, as there's nothing to compensate for.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'テキストを棒読みちゃんで読み上げます' translates to 'Reads text aloud with a monotone voice'. This specifies the verb ('reads aloud') and resource ('text'), though it doesn't need to distinguish from siblings since none exist. The mention of 'monotone voice' adds specificity about the reading style.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites, context for usage, or any exclusions. While no sibling tools exist to differentiate from, it lacks basic usage context like input format expectations or performance characteristics.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'read_text' has a singular, clear purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in this set.
A single tool inherently exhibits perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'read_text' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent with itself.
A single tool for a text-to-speech server is too minimal for practical use. While it covers the core functionality, typical MCP servers benefit from additional tools (e.g., for configuration, status checks, or voice control), making this count feel thin and limiting for agent interactions.
The tool 'read_text' provides the essential action for a text-to-speech server, but there are notable gaps. Missing operations might include stopping speech, adjusting speed or volume, checking status, or managing voice settings, which could hinder agent workflows in more complex scenarios.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
MCP server for AI dialogue using various LLM models via AceDataCloud
AI voice generation: text-to-speech and voice cloning from any MCP client.
MCP server for Text-to-Speech
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA server that enables Claude 3.7 and other AI agents to access VOICEVOX-compatible speech synthesis engines (AivisSpeech, VOICEVOX, COEIROINK) through the Model Context Protocol.112MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates with AivisSpeech to enable AI assistants to convert text to natural-sounding Japanese speech with customizable voice parameters.1578Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA text-to-speech MCP server that enables AI assistants to speak using the VOICEVOX engine with support for multi-character conversations. It features queue management, low-latency streaming via FFplay, and cross-platform playback across Windows, macOS, and Linux.714916ISC
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables text-to-speech generation and phonetic kana conversion using VOICEROID2 via voiceroid_daemon. It supports customizable voice parameters and provides cross-platform audio playback for synthesized speech.3
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/uraoz/bouyomichan-mcp-nodejs'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server