Skip to main content
Glama
unctad-ai

eRegulations MCP Server

by unctad-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to eRegulations MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides AI models with structured access to external data and services, acting as a bridge between AI assistants and applications, databases, and APIs in a standardized, secure way.
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A collection of Model Context Protocol servers providing advanced capabilities for AI assistants including professional accuracy enforcement, tool safety protocols, user preference management, and intelligent context monitoring.
      5
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides over 50 file and system management tools for AI models, including navigation, file operations, search, compression, and system information capabilities.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An implementation of the Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to communicate with Edge Security Acceleration (ESA) services, allowing models to manage routines, deployments, routes, records, and sites through standardized protocols.
      42
      27 npm
      26
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have overlapping purposes focused on procedures, but their names suggest distinct functions: getProcedureDetails likely retrieves comprehensive information, getProcedureStep targets specific steps, listProcedures enumerates procedures, and searchProcedures finds them based on criteria. Without descriptions, some ambiguity remains about the exact boundaries between getProcedureDetails and getProcedureStep, but the naming provides reasonable differentiation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with camelCase styling: getProcedureDetails, getProcedureStep, listProcedures, and searchProcedures. The verbs (get, list, search) are clear and appropriate, and the noun 'Procedures' is consistently used, making the naming highly predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on regulations or procedures, as it covers key operations like listing, searching, and retrieving details. It might be slightly thin if more complex actions (e.g., create, update, delete) are needed for the domain, but for a read-only or query-focused interface, it is well-scoped and manageable.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set provides good read/search coverage for procedures, including listing, searching, and getting details/steps, which suggests a query-oriented domain. However, there are notable gaps: no create, update, or delete tools imply a read-only surface, which might be intentional but limits agent workflows if modifications are needed. Without descriptions, it's unclear if this is by design or an omission.