get_regex

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'get' which implies a read operation, but it does not disclose what is returned, any prerequisites, or side effects. More detail would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose without any wasted words or redundancy. It is front-loaded with the key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (single parameter, output schema exists), the description is adequate. It covers the essential purpose and parameter. It does not need to explain return values due to output schema presence. A minor improvement would be to mention what is returned (e.g., 'returns the regex object').

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions 'numeric id' which matches the schema type for regex_id. However, with 0% schema description coverage, the description adds minimal value beyond restating the parameter type. It does not explain the meaning or origin of the regex_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (get), the resource (single regex), and the selection method (by numeric id). It directly distinguishes from sibling tools like list_regexes (list all) or delete_regex (delete).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a numeric ID and want one regex, but it does not explicitly state when to use vs alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or context about when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.