enable_regex

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it enables without deleting, which is a key behavioral trait. However, no annotations exist, and the description does not mention side effects, permissions, or error conditions. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Immediately states the purpose and key constraint (without deleting). Well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, straightforward action) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the essential context. Minor gap in not specifying what the output indicates about success.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage and only 1 parameter (regex_id), the description does not add any meaningful detail about what values are valid or how to obtain the ID. The parameter meaning is generic from its name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states the action (enable) and the resource (regex) with a specific condition (previously-disabled). It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like disable_regex, add_regex, and delete_regex.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for previously-disabled regexes but does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternatives. No direct comparison to disable_regex or add_regex.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.