Skip to main content
Glama
umbra2728

CTFd MCP Server

by umbra2728
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to CTFd MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FlagForge MCP Server

      ballz4z4
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with the FlagForge REST API, allowing them to search solved CTF challenges, work on live event challenges, record evidence, submit flag candidates, and write markdown writeups.
      19
      ISC

    • KadeMCP

      orgito1015
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to solve CTF challenges through natural language by disassembling binaries, cracking hashes, fuzzing web applications, extracting steganography, and running pwntools exploits.
      1
      MIT

    • CTF MCP Server

      zemi-gh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Exposes common CTF and cybersecurity tools (crypto, forensics, malware analysis, steganography, reverse engineering, pwn, OSINT) so LLMs can help solve capture-the-flag challenges in a controlled lab environment.
      -

    • ctfd-mcp

      sanjarbiy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that connects an agent to any CTFd-based CTF, letting it browse and read challenges, download challenge files, submit flags, unlock hints, and watch the live scoreboard. When the ctfd-whale plugin is present, it also starts, lists, and stops per-team dynamic instances and fetches files from them.
      12
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: starting/stopping containers, listing challenges, viewing details, and submitting flags. There is no overlap between the five tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (start_container, list_challenges, challenge_details, submit_flag, stop_container). 'challenge_details' is a noun phrase rather than a verb_noun like 'get_challenge', but the pattern is still clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a CTFd server: it covers the core user-facing actions of browsing challenges, getting details, submitting flags, and managing challenge containers. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main CTF participant workflow: list challenges, view details, start/stop containers, and submit flags. Minor gaps exist such as no tool for viewing container status or listing active containers, but agents can work around these with the provided tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources