List environments
list_environmentsRetrieve all environments for a specified project to review or manage deployment stages.
Instructions
List environments for a project.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | No |
list_environmentsRetrieve all environments for a specified project to review or manage deployment stages.
List environments for a project.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states a simple list operation, but does not disclose side effects, authentication, or return format. Acceptable for a basic read tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool, the description adequately covers its purpose. Could benefit from hinting at what an environment is, but not essential.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema coverage, the description adds meaning by linking 'project' to the tool purpose. However, it lacks detail on parameter format or constraints beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the action (list) and resource (environments for a project). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling 'add_environment'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description is too brief to mention exclusions or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ucsandman/DashClaw'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server