dashclaw_handoff_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It indicates creation but does not disclose whether it overwrites existing handoffs, requires authorization, or has side effects. The behavioral traits beyond the basic action are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence states the verb and resource, the second provides usage context. It is efficiently front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers usage and parameter content but omits return values or outcome (e.g., success indication or bundle ID). For a creation tool, the agent would benefit from knowing what to expect back.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description only repeats the schema's field list for the bundle parameter. It adds no new meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a session handoff bundle for the next session, and the context `Call this when wrapping up` reinforces the purpose. It distinguishes from siblings like `dashclaw_handoff_consume` and `dashclaw_handoff_latest`.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says `Call this when wrapping up` and advises including a summary, open loops, decisions, and state. It provides clear when-to-use guidance but does not explicitly mention when not to use or compare to alternatives like `dashclaw_session_end`.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.