get_odoo_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=False, so the agent knows it's a safe, idempotent read. The description adds 'bounded profile' to indicate limited scope, but does not elaborate on behavior like caching or data freshness. With strong annotations, the description adds marginal value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only one sentence, which is concise but under-specified. It lacks necessary detail about parameters and output, making it too sparse to be fully useful. Conciseness without completeness is not beneficial.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has three parameters and no parameter descriptions, the description is incomplete. While annotations and output schema exist, the description does not clarify the scope or intent of the parameters. This leaves the agent with insufficient information to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate by explaining the three parameters (instance, module_limit, include_modules). It provides no information about their meaning, defaults, or how they affect the output. This is a critical failure for a tool with optional parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Read' to indicate a read operation and specifies a 'bounded profile of the connected Odoo environment', which is specific enough to distinguish from write or search tools. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like 'health_check' or 'schema_catalog', and the term 'bounded profile' is somewhat vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are no statements of target use cases, prerequisites, or when not to use it. Given the many sibling tools, the lack of usage context is a significant gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.