get_odoo_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, and open-world. The description adds only 'bounded profile' which suggests a limited scope but does not explain what bound means, what the response contains, or any effects. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it is too sparse and could include more information about behavior or parameters without becoming overly wordy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has three optional parameters with no schema descriptions, and there is an output schema (not shown), the description fails to provide enough context for an agent to understand the profile scope, parameter effects, or typical use cases. It is insufficient for autonomous usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter schema coverage is 0%, meaning no descriptions are provided for any of the three parameters. The tool description does not mention or explain any parameter (include_modules, module_limit, instance). Thus it adds no value beyond the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it reads a 'bounded profile' of the Odoo environment. The verb 'Read' and resource 'bounded profile' indicate a read operation. However, 'bounded' is somewhat vague and does not fully differentiate it from sibling tools like 'health_check' which might also inspect environment state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or when not to use it. Sibling tools like 'health_check' or 'diagnose_odoo_call' have overlapping purposes, but no differentiation is offered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.