The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one performs a global search across all aggregated job boards, while the other retrieves jobs for a specific company. There is no ambiguity or overlap in their intended use cases.

Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern (search_jobs, get_company_jobs), using snake_case and action-first naming. This makes the tool set predictable and easy to reason about.

With only two tools, the surface feels minimal but not unreasonable for a narrow job-search aggregation domain. However, the count is at the low end of the spectrum and may limit agent flexibility—additional capabilities like filtering or retrieving specific job details would make it more useful.

The tools cover global search and company-specific retrieval, which are the core operations for job browsing. However, there is no way to retrieve a single job's full details, apply filters within search, or access other lifecycle operations like saving or applying, leaving notable gaps for a complete job-search workflow.