Skip to main content
Glama
deenesjakoruzh
truss44

Crypto Price & Market Analysis MCP Server

by truss44
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

加密货币价格和市场分析 MCP 服务器

铁匠徽章 NPM 下载

一个模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器，使用 CoinCap API 提供全面的加密货币分析。该服务器通过易于使用的界面提供实时价格数据、市场分析和历史趋势。

用法

将此配置添加到您的 Claude Desktop 配置文件：

  • MacOS ： ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

  • Windows ： %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-crypto-price": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-crypto-price"]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP server: mcp-coincap-jj

可选：CoinCap API 密钥

如需更高的速率限制，请在您的配置中添加 API 密钥：

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-crypto-price": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-crypto-price"],
      "env": {
        "COINCAP_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

重要提示：CoinCap 即将停用其 v2 API。本 MCP 同时支持 v2 和 v3 API：

  • 如果您提供COINCAP_API_KEY ，它将首先尝试使用 v3 API，必要时回退到 v2

  • 如果没有 API 密钥，它将使用 v2 API（最终将停止使用）

  • 建议从pro.coincap.io/dashboard获取 API 密钥，因为 v2 API 将来会被完全停用

启动 Claude Desktop 开始使用加密分析工具。

工具

获取加密货币价格

获取任何加密货币的当前价格和 24 小时统计数据，包括：

  • 当前美元价格

  • 24小时价格变动

  • 交易量

  • 市值

  • 市场排名

获取市场分析

提供详细的市场分析，包括：

  • 交易量排名前五的交易所

  • 不同交易所的价格差异

  • 体积分布分析

  • VWAP（成交量加权平均价格）

获取历史分析

分析历史价格数据：

  • 可定制的时间间隔（5分钟至1天）

  • 支持最多30天的历史数据

  • 价格趋势分析

  • 波动率指标

  • 高/低价范围

示例提示

  • “比特币现在的价格是多少？”

  • “向我展示 ETH 的市场分析”

  • “给我 DOGE 的 7 天价格历史记录”

  • “交易 BTC 的顶级交易所有哪些？”

  • “显示间隔 1 小时的 SOL 价格趋势”

项目灵感

该项目的灵感来自 Alex Andru 的coincap-mcp项目。

执照

该项目采用 MIT 许可证

Available Tools

3 tools
get-crypto-priceBInspect

Get current price and 24h stats for a cryptocurrency

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYesCryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH)

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry full burden. Only states output is price and 24h stats, but omits details like update frequency, data source, or behavior on invalid symbol.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no unnecessary words, front-loaded with verb and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple tool (1 param, no output schema, no annotations), description is adequate for basic understanding but lacks detail on what '24h stats' includes (e.g., change, volume).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds no extra detail beyond 'gets crypto price for given symbol'; schema already specifies symbol as string with examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'get', resource 'current price and 24h stats', and scope 'cryptocurrency'. Easily distinguished from siblings 'historical-analysis' and 'market-analysis'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., for historical data use get-historical-analysis). No exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-historical-analysisBInspect

Get historical price analysis with customizable timeframe

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoNumber of days to analyze (1-30)
intervalNoTime interval (m5, m15, m30, h1, h2, h6, h12, d1)h1
symbolYesCryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH)

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description does not disclose behavioral traits such as data source (e.g., real-time vs delayed), caching, rate limits, or whether the analysis includes derived metrics like moving averages.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action and key qualifier. No wasted words, but could benefit from a second sentence to enhance completeness without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so the agent cannot infer return format or fields. Description lacks details on data scope (e.g., OHLCV, volume) and pagination. Adequate for a simple analysis tool but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, parameters are documented. The description adds 'customizable timeframe' but does not elaborate on default behavior or mutually exclusive options beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves historical price analysis with customizable timeframe. It distinguishes from 'get-crypto-price' (current price) and 'get-market-analysis' (broader market).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The description does not specify context like trend analysis vs point-in-time price, nor any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-market-analysisBInspect

Get detailed market analysis including top exchanges and volume distribution

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYesCryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH)

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It only mentions 'detailed' analysis without disclosing behavioral traits like rate limits, authentication needs, or mutability. The description adds minimal value beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence long and front-loaded with the main purpose. It is efficient but could be slightly more informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one param, no output schema, no annotations), the description minimally covers purpose but lacks context on when to use or what to expect. It is adequate but not complete for an autonomous agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'symbol' is fully described in the schema with coverage at 100%. The description repeats 'e.g., BTC, ETH' which is already in the schema, adding no new semantic information. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves 'detailed market analysis' and specifies included data like 'top exchanges and volume distribution'. It distinguishes itself from siblings 'get-crypto-price' (price only) and 'get-historical-analysis' (historical data).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for market analysis but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives. No guidance on prerequisites or exclusions is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 3 tool updatesv1.0.0
    • First observedget-crypto-price
    • First observedget-historical-analysis
    • First observedget-market-analysis
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get-crypto-price focuses on current price and 24-hour stats, get-historical-analysis covers historical price data with customizable timeframes, and get-market-analysis provides detailed market insights like top exchanges and volume distribution. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens (get-crypto-price, get-historical-analysis, get-market-analysis). The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a server described as 'Crypto Price & Market Analysis.' While the tools cover key areas, more comprehensive analysis might require additional operations like trend prediction, exchange comparisons, or portfolio tracking, suggesting a borderline under-scoping.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover current price, historical analysis, and market analysis, which are core to the domain, but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool for comparing multiple cryptocurrencies, fetching real-time alerts, or performing predictive analytics, which could limit agent workflows in a full market analysis context.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • mcp-coincap-jj

    wazzan
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive cryptocurrency analysis using the CoinCap API. This server offers real-time price data, market analysis, and historical trends through an easy-to-use interface. Updated to use Coin Cap API v3
    3
    68 npm
    1
    MIT

  • Realtime Crypto MCP Server

    smhnkmr
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A server that provides real-time cryptocurrency data through the Model Context Protocol, allowing access to detailed exchange information and current cryptocurrency rates from the CoinCap API.
    13 npm
    1
    MIT

  • My HTTP MCP Server

    joheiss
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that provides cryptocurrency data tools and resources via an HTTP endpoint. It enables users to fetch real-time market data from Binance, track activity logs, and generate cryptocurrency executive summaries.
    -

Appeared in Searches